<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Frank Carver&#039;s Punch Barrel &#187; anonymity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.punchbarrel.com/tag/anonymity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.punchbarrel.com</link>
	<description>Frank Carver&#039;s musings about software and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Information distribution and ownership</title>
		<link>http://blog.punchbarrel.com/2008/07/13/information-distribution-and-ownership/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.punchbarrel.com/2008/07/13/information-distribution-and-ownership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[messaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.punchbarrel.com/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m currently mulling around a bunch of thoughts and half-formed opinions on the distribution, ownership and attribution of ideas and information in an age of free-flowing digital media. One of my current concerns is the tension between perceived needs one the one hand for attribution, academic traceability and ownership of ones own words; and on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m currently mulling around a bunch of thoughts and half-formed opinions on the distribution, ownership and attribution of ideas and information in an age of free-flowing digital media.</p>
<p>One of my current concerns is the tension between perceived needs one the one hand for attribution, academic traceability and ownership of ones own words; and on the other hand for privacy. This is seen in sharpest relief in solicitations for academic surveys. Routinely such instruments come with a disclaimer pointing out that all answers will be anonymous. Well-structured surveys and questionnaires, though, often also contain a section for general comments and feedback. In most cases I do not want this to be anonymous &#8211; indeed I would rather it formed part of a dialogue between the researcher and subjects, allowing both to benefit, learn and develop.</p>
<p>I am considering taking up a habit of always adding my contact details to academic survey submissions to deliberately challenge the assumption that I wish to be an anonymous donor of information, and to encourage researchers to participate in a community of interest.</p>
<p>Some things I have read recently on associated topics include:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.mathemagenic.com/2008/07/10/blogging-research-attribution-and-ownership-of-ideas/">Mathemagenic Â» Blogging research: attribution and ownership of ideas</a></p>
<p><a href="http://peeps.3greeneggs.com/joecblog/2008/07/07/personal-publishing/">Read at Joeâ€™s Â» Blog Archive Â» Personal Publishing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.punchbarrel.com/2008/07/13/information-distribution-and-ownership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.377 seconds -->
