<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Merge, Replace, or Patch: How Astoria Handles Changing Data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.punchbarrel.com/2008/06/20/merge-replace-or-patch-how-astoria-handles-changing-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.punchbarrel.com/2008/06/20/merge-replace-or-patch-how-astoria-handles-changing-data/</link>
	<description>Frank Carver&#039;s musings about software and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:15:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blog.punchbarrel.com/2008/06/20/merge-replace-or-patch-how-astoria-handles-changing-data/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.punchbarrel.com/?p=124#comment-56</guid>
		<description>I see what you mean. It&#039;s all very well talking about data records. It&#039;s quite another thing with that &quot;other stuff&quot;. I expect they&#039;ll dream up some polymorphic OO scheme, where objects provide their own management API.  As for merging an &quot;apple&quot; with an &quot;orange&quot;, it makes no sense. MERGE can only function on things where MERGE is rational. The problem then becomes - is the Astoria team rational!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see what you mean. It&#8217;s all very well talking about data records. It&#8217;s quite another thing with that &#8220;other stuff&#8221;. I expect they&#8217;ll dream up some polymorphic OO scheme, where objects provide their own management API.  As for merging an &#8220;apple&#8221; with an &#8220;orange&#8221;, it makes no sense. MERGE can only function on things where MERGE is rational. The problem then becomes &#8211; is the Astoria team rational!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://blog.punchbarrel.com/2008/06/20/merge-replace-or-patch-how-astoria-handles-changing-data/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.punchbarrel.com/?p=124#comment-55</guid>
		<description>My point really is that it can never be fully defined. How should I merge two JPG images? How should I merge two timestamps? How should I merge two sonnets?

Even if they can be defined in some way, how should I merge a JPG image with the result of merging a sonnet and a timestamp?

Madness!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point really is that it can never be fully defined. How should I merge two JPG images? How should I merge two timestamps? How should I merge two sonnets?</p>
<p>Even if they can be defined in some way, how should I merge a JPG image with the result of merging a sonnet and a timestamp?</p>
<p>Madness!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blog.punchbarrel.com/2008/06/20/merge-replace-or-patch-how-astoria-handles-changing-data/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.punchbarrel.com/?p=124#comment-54</guid>
		<description>If I can use an analogy to that in my own domain, a GET would be a SELECT, and a PUT would be an INSERT or, if the data exists, a DELETE followed by an INSERT. 

UPDATE works in the SQL area, presumably because it is defined. Would you be satisfied if MERGE were well defined, or is that not possible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I can use an analogy to that in my own domain, a GET would be a SELECT, and a PUT would be an INSERT or, if the data exists, a DELETE followed by an INSERT. </p>
<p>UPDATE works in the SQL area, presumably because it is defined. Would you be satisfied if MERGE were well defined, or is that not possible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.138 seconds -->

